Žalbeno vijeće Haaškog suda na očitovanju o žalbi hrvatske šestorke zaključilo da nije dokazan element krivičnog djela i ukida osuđujući dio za zločin “bezobzirnog razaranja gradova i sela” u odnosu na Stari most. Rušenje Starog mosta u Mostaru bilo je vojno opravdano, zaključilo je žalbeno vijeće u srijedu na izricanju presude Prliću i drugima, prihvaćajući tako žalbe obrane bosanskohercegovačke šestorice. ‘
‘Uništenje Starog mosta nije predstavljalo progon i zaključci zaslužuju da se ponište. Žalbeno vijeće zaključuje da nije dokazan element ovog kaznenog djela i preinačuje zaključak da je tužiteljstvo dokazalo da je Stari most bezobzirno razaranje. HVO je imao vojni interes u razaranju starog mosta, te nije imao konkretnu namjeru da diskriminira i vrši teror, kad su uništili Stari most”, naveo je sudac Carmel Agius.
Prvostupanjskom presudom bilo je utvrđeno da se radilo o razaranju neporavdanom vojnim potrebama iako vijeće tada nije osporilo da je most bio vojni cilj. U prvostupanjskoj presudi bilo je zaključeno da je razaranje mosta rezultiralo potpunom izolacijom dijela stanovnika Mostara i imalo je nesrazmjerno veliki psihološki učinak na stanovništvo u odnosi na vojne koristi od rušenja mosta. stoga je raspravno vijeće zaključilo da se radilo o razaranju neporavdanom vojnom potrebom.
Žalbeno vijeće uz izdvojeno mišljenje talijanskog suca Fausta Pocara, zaključilo je da je raspravno vijeće donijelo pogrešne zaključke o rušenju mosta i posljedičnom učinku teroriziranja stanovnika te je oslobodilo krivnje šestoricu u tom dijelu presude , kazao je predsjedavajući sudac Carmel Agius.
Vijeće je ukinulo presude koje se odnose na razaranje velikih razmjera. Žalbeno vijeće ukida zaključak Raspravnog vijeća da je sukob HVO-a i Armije BiH postojao samo tamo gdje su se aktivno vodile borbe te djelomično usvaja Ćorićevu žalbu, a vezano za osude u vezi s njegovom odgovornošću kao ministra vanjskih poslova. Agius je naveo da je odbačen prigovor Praljka i Stojića da se kao dokazi izbace dnevnici Ratka Mladića, za koje su optuženi naveli da je riječ o dokazima iz druge ruke. “Žalbeno vijeće konstatira da oni nisu pokazali postojanje greške”, kazao je Augis.
U žalbenom vijeću, kojemu predsjeda malteški sudac Agius, su i Kinez Liu Daqun, Talijan Fausto Pocar, Amerikanac Theodor Meron i Južnoafrikanac Bakone Justice Moloto. Vođe najmalobrojnijeg naroda u BiH nepravomoćno su u svibnju 2013. osuđeni na ukupno 111 godina zatvora zbog progona, ubojstva, silovanja, deportacije, zatvaranja, uništavanja imovine širokih razmjera i drugih zločina, počinjenih u okviru udruženog zločinačkog pothvata.
Bivši predsjednik vlade Herceg Bosne Jadranko Prlić nepravomoćno je tada osuđen na 25 godina zatvora, bivši ministar obrane Bruno Stojić i bivši načelnici Glavnog stožera HVO-a Slobodan Praljak i Milivoj Petković na po 20 godina zatvora, bivši zapovjednik vojne policije Valentin Ćorić na 16, a načelnik Ureda za razmjenu zarobljenika Berislav Pušić na 10 godina zatvora.
Suci su većinom glasova, uz izdvojeno mišljenje predsjedavajućeg suca Jeana Claudea Antonettija, presudili kako im je cilj bio etnički očistiti Bošnjake iz većinski hrvatskog dijela BiH i u slučaju raspada države pripojiti ga Hrvatskoj, prema zločinačkom planu u kojem je sudjelovao prvi hrvatski predsjednik Franjo Tuđman i uz njega ministar obrane Gojko Šušak i načelnik glavnog stožera Janko Bobetko. Ročištu nije nazočio Pušić uz odobrenje suda.
8 komentara
Genocide upon Croatian 95 procent catholic is excaptable..extermination 650 000 Croats and dispel Fom Bih are exceptible for politicly motivated extention war of corupt justice where they send strog massege Croatian people can’t have rights to defended themself.
Supporting former genocide upon catolic as muslim Turkey empire are exceptible yoo and never been justiyiffay as today.
As they also support Serbian agression upon Croatia and extremination and genocide Croats from slavonija dalmacija and so on exzetlry some simpatizers against 95 procent catholic Croats.
Did we need political motivated justice system where we are not equal defended our-self?
Did we need respect them and why?
If you know they supporting and genocide Serbian and Muslim both fascizam and communist genocide which they committed against Croatians civilian population. in both war ww2 and 91’95’ wars.
If you know rehabilitation of history genocide which communist and Serbs and Muslim commuted upon Croats are exceptionable but in order to destroy Croatian 95 pro-cent catholic is exceptionable in order created great Serbia and Great Muslim state on Croatian historic land which they lived for 1000 years.
Why you think Croats Catholic need give forgiveness genocide killing and destruction and aggression to others?
-as fascist Serbian cetnik or committed during ww2 and Serbs forces 91′-95′
-as Muslim fascist or partisan ww2 and 91-95′
-as Serbian creation state upon Croats historic land
-as Muslim creation of state upon Croatian land
Why Croatian victims minimize in BiH and in Croatia on Croats historic land which is for 1000 years historic land on Croatians but don’t have some rights according Geneva Conventions.
Are you for sure political justice system is not extension war against Croatian victims and Croatian catholic population as it is 95 pro-cent of Catholic lived there?!
If you know Croatians civilian population as Catholic is highly discriminated citizen in Australia Canada Great Britain France United state America and on another country too.
Croats which they lived on western association are highly discriminated where they lived modern 100 years as others people and nation and religion and make economic financial even as defenders of country where they lived.
Are you for sure justice system is unfair or motivated as discriminatory factors against them?
If you folloving great numbers in former dictators country as former yugoslavia where they imprison or observe or put trough mental institution nilly complite Croatian population under which torchering reason exploded into war.
Extension of torchering and discrimination is extend in another country where ever they lived.
Is that fair to compare as others which they committed genocide and discriminated Croats which they lived comfortable in western world then Croats.
Why you think they rehabilitated Serbs fascism Muslim fascism from former Yugoslavia.
Why you think they except genocide of communist partisan upon Croats civilian populations?
Why you think Geneva Convention not exist for Croatians
civilian population in order to defended them-self?
Why you think Croatian people don’t have rights on media others have?
Did you know who is others who don’t liked dislike minimize and killing torching exterminated
and expel 95 pro-cent of Catholic?
Why you think Tito partisan have rights destroy bridge on Nertva during ww2 war and been world wide exceptionable?
Why you think Croats don’t have any rights defended them-self on some way!
Why you think Muslim have rights build that bridge under Muslim empire where they passing to killing many catholic Croats as much as could during Muslim empire?
Why you think its not been some passage bridge to killing and committed genocide upon Croatians Catholic civilian population on massive scale as Muslim former Empire and atheist Tito communist?
Is exceptionable killed Croatian 95 pro-cent catholic civilian population and exterminated them without any rights to defended them-self?
Why you think extermination and killing or dispel Catholic Croats on massive scale is exceptionable as Muslim as atheist Communist or others according Geneva Convention?
Under statistic of population from BiH where dissappier 650 000 Croats?
Why they don’t have rights defended them-self where they been killed as groups or massive group or dispel or houses church factory cemetery private business destroy to them on massive scale trough place town or city?
Why you think judge have to look upon how many Croats defenders kills as single issue but not see how much on massive group or scale Muslim or Serbs or communist killed or dispel or exterminated or destroy property to Croats ?
Why you think 95 % pro-cent Croatian Catholic don’t have any rights and freedom on media where others have rights and try to be manipulative upon them as they dislike or minimize Croatian Catholic and been involve as helpers dispel Croats from Croats historic site 1000 years old history as hard liners of communist family or simpatic or Serbs or Muslim?
Za istina :
Tema je STARI MOST u Mostaru !
Hitler je takodjer imao mogucnost proglasiti ga ” ciljem od strateskog znacaja ” , ali nije !!!! I nije ga srusio , a trebalo bi mu 1/10 granata koje je ispalila sirokobrijeska pukovnija !!!!
Hitler , koliki god zlocinac bio ( najveci u 20.stoljecu ) nije dirnuo u taj most ! A zasto ???? Zato jer je znao i bio informiran koliko vremena i sredstava treba da se takvo nesto napravi !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lako je rusiti , ali jako,jako tesko graditi !!
Dajte mi dovoljno eksploziva i maknite sve neduzne gradjane da netko ne nastrada i u sekundi stisnem gumb da se srusi Agrokorov toranj !!! Ali , ako trazite da napravim isti takav , treba mi barem 10 generacija. Isto Vam je i sa Starim mostom, koliko god da je bio ” vojni cilj ” !!!! Tko ima mozak razumije , a tko nema njemu je najjednostavnije RAZARATI !!!!
Tuco and Blondie,dobar los zao
herceg bosna iz hercegovine-pa gdje ti ode od Hitlera do Agrikorovog tornja….mogla si se onda vratiti i ranije u prolost, primjrice u doba vladavine turskog zuluma, kad su ljude nabijali na kolac, ili kad tu turske paše otimali hercegovackoj sirotinji, kad su naplacivali porez što troše zube jedući hranu katolika…..da ne pišem gore strahote. Lako je srati zaklonjen plaštom anonimnosti.